Thursday, March 31, 2011

Elizabeth Taylor: The Lost Interview

A never-before-seen 'Rolling Stone' chat with the Hollywood icon
By Jonathan Cott

In 1987, Rolling Stone Contributing Editor Jonathan Cott sat down with Elizabeth Taylor in her suite at New York's Hôtel Plaza Athénée, when the actress was 55. "There was no standing on ceremony, no pretense, no pulling punches," recalls Cott. "She was so forthright, witty and fearless." The previously unpublished interview is presented here for the first time.

You started making films in Hollywood during the 1940s. How has the movie business changed since then?
It used to be a sin to be considered a Hollywood actor. Even worse to be a star — God forbid a superstar. Stage actors would accuse people of selling out when they'd go to Hollywood. Actually, I think the whole thing is a bunch of bullshit, and I always have. An actor is an actor whether it's in Hollywood, whether it's in Africa, whether it's on stage, television or in film. Acting has to be generated from within.
  • Read More
  • Webcam Nuclear Power Plant

    Views from the observatory at 5 hours of 19 - are delivered in one hour intervals.
    You can update the image, the image can be viewed by accessing the latest again.
    When bad weather or strong backlight, the screen may be hard to see.
    The shooting may stop by convenience. If so, post the last picture taken.
    Google Translated.
  • Source
  • Wednesday, March 30, 2011

    One World Currency

    This Daily bell article makes some good points. One is that George Soros is a player, like Marurice Strong is a player, but the real forces are the IMF and powerful bankers from the US and London. The article also points how we see these dialectics set up like this one between a global currency and the dollar, then out of what seems like a heated debate between Right and Left comes a compromise, and then we're further along the route to the New World Order.

    We have travelled so far from free market principles that the power elite aren't arguing over socialism and a free market -- they are deciding how to structure the power. Geithner floated this balloon last year, and now we'll likely see some action. Obama might appear aloof regarding our piddling national problems, because he's got his eyes on World President down the road. He'll have to run against Bill Clinton and Clinton's campaign manager Chris Matthews.

    It all sounds like a conspiracy, except that it's not really being hidden.

    The Article starts:

    Two years ago, George Soros (left) said he wanted to reorganize the entire global economic system. In two short weeks, he is going to start – and no one seems to have noticed. On April 8, a group he's funded with $50 million is holding a major economic conference and Soros's goal for such an event is to "establish new international rules" and "reform the currency system." It's all according to a plan laid out in a Nov. 4, 2009, Soros op-ed calling for "a grand bargain that rearranges the entire financial order." – Media Research Center/Wall Street Journal

    Dominant Social Theme: Soros, up to his old tricks. This leftist billionaire should just go home.

    Free-Market Analysis: We'd realized last week (tipped off by a considerate feedbacker) just what George Soros was up to; but before we had a chance to write about it the Wall Street Journal blew the story open last night by picking up a Media Research Center article by Dan Gainor entitled "Unreported Soros Event Aims to Remake Entire Global Economy." We can safely say that Soros' planned new Bretton Woods Conference to build a new world currency, starting April 8, is unreported no more.

  • More at Source
  • Dumb and Dumber and Dumberer

    I like the way this guy writes, he gets his point across

    By Barry Ferguson
    Created 27 Mar 2011
    The Federal Reserve is not only the most profitable company in the world, it is now the largest in terms of earnings. How did society get so dumb to let this happen?

    Jim Carrey starred in the movie 'Dumb and Dumber' in 1994. The movie told the story of the two stupidest humans on earth - Lloyd Christmas and Harry Dunne. They were 'dumb' and 'dumber'. But, even this over the top portrayal of these two stupid characters could not possibly equal the stupidity of the real characters that run our world today. They can only be described as 'dumberer'. Even worse, our 'leaders' must think of the rest of us as 'dumbererest'.

    While I must admit that government has the general citizenry pretty well characterized (readers of articles such as this excluded), there are times when those of us who know better must speak out. It seems that every calamity in modern times gives the central banks an excuse to plunder treasuries and enrich the banking cartel. The big banks get rich and the rest of us pay for it. We willingly allow for such pilfering as long as the stock market goes up. Every move from the central banks is targeted to do just such a thing. An earthquake/tsunami struck Japan on March 11, 2011. The yen immediately appreciated and their stock market fell. The central banks of the G-7 immediately intervened to sell trillions in yen to stem the market plunge. The insanity is this: Why can't the 'market' decide where the yen or the market should be priced? The people of Japan needed help. A nuclear power facility threatened to 'melt down'. Yet, the BOJ's could only think of supporting the stock market. The US central bank is no different. Every disaster is a license to manipulate. Central banks intervene in market price discovery. For instance, our Fed is currently busy with QE2 intervention.

    The absurdity with which our government behaves, the arrogance with which they dictate, and the preposterousness of their economic imposition is an insult to any life form beyond a jelly fish. In case you don't know, jelly fish are an organism without a brain. They also use the same orifice to feed and excrete. For reasons such as these, I tend to associate jelly fish with our rulers (government) - the Federal Reserve. Allow me to shed some light on the effects of intervention so we can decide if it is helpful.

    The latest episode of insanity directed to the dumberest occurred on Tuesday, March 22, 2011. The Federal Reserve announced that 2010 brought forth record profits. (Remember - a lot of dumb people think the Fed is a part of the US government.) No, not for us - for them! The Fed made a record $81.7 billion in 2010 'largely on investments made to help the economy and banks weather the 2007 - 2009 financial crisis'. As per their mandate, they turned over the bulk of the loot to the US Treasury - some $79.3 billion. (Remember - there are a lot dumber people that think the Fed does not operate as a 'for profit', 'private bank'.) This adds to the $47.4 billion the Fed transferred to the Treasury in 2009. The Fed would like us to believe this is a wonderful development in that they have transferred to the Treasury a sum of $126.7 billion over the past two years. (Remember, there are a lot of dumberest people that actually think the Fed acts only in the best interests of its subjects. There are more Pelosi types running around than you would think.)

    How again did the Fed earn $87.7 billion in a year? They are, of course, an intervening market manipulation machine. And, they are indeed a bank and banks make money by lending it. Don't forget trading securities and derivatives is also profitable if you have all the inside information. The Fed has an advantage in that they can simply conjure money out of thin air for which to lend. Better yet, they can simply 'create' money on spreadsheets for which to lend. And, on all the money they steal from their subjects, uh..., I mean 'create', they charge interest! Could there be a better business model for pure profits? Now, think for a moment. Wouldn't a profound financial crisis to a government present an opportunity to lend huge sums of money and impose vast power? Think a little harder. Name a company that profited more from the financial meltdown of the last decade than the Federal Reserve?

    For perspective, Exxon made an estimated $30 billion for the year 2010. Yet, somehow the dumberest of the dumber society malign companies like Exxon as corporate pigs. These people think companies that make tens of billions of dollars in profits are obscene and they should be subjected to 'windfall' taxation. The Fed beat Exxon by a factor of 3! Do we hear any complaining? In reality, we can now say that the Federal Reserve is by earnings the largest company operating in the US. And yes, for the dumberestest people, the Fed is a 'private corporation' feeding on the US taxpayer. How did they make their money again? Oh yeah, the were 'helping' their banking friends through a crisis. Please, tell that to Lloyd Christmas! The real question is, are we now better off for all the Fed's intervention? After all, the Fed did give the Treasury $126.7 billion in windfall earnings over the last two years. While I admit that I graduated from public schools, I decided to make like Jethro Bodine and commence to do a little ciphering.

    Besides the forfeiture of capitalism, freedom, dignity, and sovereignty, how much did this $125.7 billion cost us? From the end of 2008 to the end of 2010, the national debt grew from $10.7 trillion to $14 trillion. That's an increase of $3.3 trillion. That was the capital the Fed used to 'help the economy and banks' through the financial disaster that they, the Fed, helped to generate. That $3.3 trillion was borrowed at an average interest rate of 3.1% (according to the Fed). Once I cipher $3.3 trillion times 3.1% using my 'times-its table' (okay, I used a calculator), I come up with $102 billion in interest coupons on the extra debt. $125.7 billion minus the $102 billion nets the Treasury about $24 billion on the deal. That is, until we have to roll the debt over in another seven to ten years and then it costs the tax payers another $102 billion (or whatever the prevailing interest rates might dictate) and now the whole deal is a loser to the tune of hundreds of billions on top of the tens of trillions that the country already cannot repay. Yet, the Federal Reserve rakes in record profits from this action. The tax payers accumulate record debt. If we focus on that aspect, we miss the point of the Fed's intent. The most important thing is that Mr. Dimon of J.P. Morgan and Mr. Moynihan of Bank of America got their $20 million dollar compensation packages. That makes me feel better, anyway!

    So we are supposed to believe that the Fed has our best interest at heart. They are working hard to revive the economy and restore our portfolios. Please, we would have to be dumber than the dumberestest person on earth to believe that! Let's look at how dumb the Fed thinks we are.

    The Fed produces a report on the fiscal condition of the citizenry in the US.

    From the Federal Reserve statistical release year 2010 'Flow of Funds Accounts of the United States' page 118 (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/z1.pdf [1]):

    'Balance Sheet of Household and Nonprofit Organizations with Equity Detail' - From 2008 to 2010, 'Assets' grew from $65.5 trillion to $70.7 trillion. Let us make note, however, that 'Tangible assets' fell from $24.3 trillion to $23.1 trillion. Where did the 'Asset' increase come from? 'Equity shares at market value' rose from $12.4 trillion to $18.1 trillion. 'Net Worth' rose from $51.3 trillion to $56.8 trillion. Net worth increases were a function of the stock market only. Real assets like real estate continued to contract. The Fed is using market manipulation to fool its audience. After all, the top 10 percent of income earners own 90% of all stocks. Mutual fund ownership is even less than 50% of the US populace. The 'net worth' increase is confined to stock owners and even then, to large stock owners. We can corroborate this notion with all the other analysis out today showing an ever widening gap between rich and poor. Therefore, modern economic improvement only holds true for a slim minority of already very wealthy friends of the Fed.

    What is the fiscal condition of the US government?

    Same release, page 68 - 'L.106 Federal Government' - 'Total financial assets' grew from $1.268 trillion to $1.650 trillion. That roughly $400 billion dollar gain came from two areas. One, 'Agency- and GSE-backed securities' grew from $54 billion to $225 billion and two, 'Consumer credit' grew from $111 billion to $317 billion. In case you want to know, the 'agency' stuff is bad mortgage paper held by Fannie and Freddie (the Fed 'transferred' the 'equity' to us, the taxpayers, while they kept the 'loan') and 'consumer credit' is actually 'student loans' (I followed the asterisk). Yes, 'student loans' are actually counted as an 'asset'. Aren't student loan default rates pretty high?

    This is information we need to know so allow me to expand my topic here. The student loan default rate reported by the government is currently 7%. Of course, since this is a government number, we know without question it is yet another bald face lie. Our government cannot utter one letter of one syllable of one word of truth if Jesus wrote it on an index card and God helped move their jaw. So, I did a little reading. According to Mark Kantrowitz of FinAid (in an article published by msn.com, 2010), there is about $730 billion in outstanding federal and private student loan debt and only 40% is actively being repaid. You can do your own ciphering on the real default rate but 7% ain't the right answer. Don't forget to carry the knots when you do your 'gozendas'! Of course Sallie Mae accounts for half of this figure but we must remember, the new government regulations now give Sallie a virtual monopoly in student loans. Two last points. First, this type of debt cannot easily be washed away by bankruptcy and can therefore be carried on the books regardless of potential collectibility. That makes the assets of the government seem larger than reality. Also, one of the players in the student loan world is a company named Student Loan Corp. They are a division of - guess who? - Citigroup. Do I smell rat droppings? Yes, again, the bank makes the money to service the loan and the tax payer is on the hook for defaults. Second, with the default numbers as bad as they really are, student loans that experience a stoppage of payment after two years of commencement are no longer statistically factored. Those loan defaults are not counted. That's why the 7% government number is so ridiculous.

    Also interesting, Federal liabilities grew in 2010 by a little over $3 trillion and almost all of that was of course 'Treasury securities'. So, the Fed wants us to believe that government assets are growing and total $1.650 trillion. Yet, the Federal Reserve now boasts of assets totaling over $2.4 trillion!

    So, the Fed has assets of $2.4 trillion and no debt (everything they have is guaranteed by the taxpayers and everything they buy comes from money they 'print' from our Treasury) and the US government has assets of $1.6 trillion and $14 trillion in debt. Yes, it should be apparent to even the dumberest of dumb, we have been swindled. See my previous article on the Fed's swindle: The Fed's Furtive Filching [2]. But there's more.

    All this manipulation and stimulation and intervention has pumped a ton of money into the big bank cartel's hands. Uh, I mean the 'financial system'. And yes, a lot of that money has made its way into rallying the stock market. Let's go even dumber with the Fed. Uh, I mean, 'deeper'.

    March 22, 2011 - Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Richard Fisher said he is "beginning to see the signs of speculative excess" in the US. He added, " There's a lot of liquidity sloshing around the US financial system". I didn't get the transcript of the entire speech but he must have also expressed his sudden realization that the Earth was not really flat! Maybe he is seeing signs that the Earth orbits the Sun! Perhaps he is also seeing signs that the invention of the wheel might be useful! We must remind ourselves that Mr. Fisher is known to be a 'hawkish' member of the Fed. We currently have earthquakes and tsunamis exacting severe economic damage (Japan's HAARP-ing), riots spurred by economic disparity (Mideast and Northern Africa, parts of Asia), countries bowing to central banks for debt bailouts (the US, Greece, Ireland,...), inflation threatening the fastest growing economies (China, India, Brazil), a melting US currency, the worst new home sales for the month of February, 2011 in history (since 1963 when statistics were started), falling durable goods orders for the fourth month in a row in February (2011), military conquests everywhere, no budget in the US because the gutless Congress can neither cut spending nor sign off on another $1.5 trillion in borrowed money to add to the already $14.2 trillion debt that cannot be repaid, and economies totally supported by central bank injections. And yet, the stock market rallies on. Speculative excess? Boy, I wonder what finally opened Mr. Fisher's eyes? Sadly, he also thinks that the economy is improving (in the face of new home sales falling to the lowest level since records began in 1963), unemployment is 8.9% (despite a 3/23/2011 IBD< front page story reporting the 'real' number of 22% confirming that absolutely no one in the entire solar system believes the fake-o US government numbers), and that Fed-induced inflationary effects would be 'transitory' (as they always are until rising prices eventually collapse an economy). Dumb, dumber, dumberest, and even dumberestest. Why do we accept so many lies? Why do we tolerate a government of mendacity? How has a country conceived by geniuses like Jefferson and Madison (framed a constitution to greatly limit the powers of the federal government), and guided by the sheer indomitable courage of Andrew Jackson (vetoed the charter of the central bank of his time) fallen so far? Why has surrender to these evils of government and central banking come so easily? Because, our country is not only inhabited by the Lloyd Christmases and Harry Dunnes of the world, but we are led by these intellectual dwarfs. Dumb and dumber and dumberest indeed! Thank you for taking time to read this piece. Now spread the truth. Me? I've got stocks to buy to keep the speculative excess going!
  • Source
  • WikiLeaks billboard erected in Hollywood

    Los Angeles - Private donations from around the world contributed to the erection of a billboard in support of whistleblower website WikiLeaks in Los Angeles.
    The campaign began on 6 March on the Epic Step website, taking six days and 195 pledges to reach its target of $4300.
    Pledges came from across the globe, with support for the campaign from Sweden, Canada, Germany, Australia and Brazil, as well as from across the United Sates of America.
    The campaign founder writes: "It is my sincere hope that everyone who believes in freedom of speech and transparency in government will take action [...] We need to show our elected officials that we defend WikiLeaks [...] Billboards in L.A. can produce over 1.5 million views in a single month."
    "Advertising power rests with big corporations or well-funded special interests," says the campaign website, "you probably can't afford a billboard on your own."
    Currently in alpha stage with only a small number of campaigns running, the website intends to support messages for any purpose: "Political, religious, environmental, sports and everything in between." Others are running in support of rescued dog adoption, "Charlie Sheen has Tiger Blood," and "Lakers Rule Your City," to be placed in New Orleans before the upcoming NBA basketball playoff games.
    A second campaign in support of Wikileaks is underway for a billboard in Chicago.
    Rumours suggest that Epic Step intend to extend their campaign capabilities to other countries.
  • Source

  • Japan may have lost race to save nuclear reactor

    The radioactive core in a reactor at the crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant appears to have melted through the bottom of its containment vessel and on to a concrete floor, experts say, raising fears of a major release of radiation at the site.

    The warning follows an analysis by a leading US expert of radiation levels at the plant. Readings from reactor two at the site have been made public by the Japanese authorities and Tepco, the utility that operates it.

    Richard Lahey, who was head of safety research for boiling-water reactors at General Electric when the company installed the units at Fukushima, told the Guardian workers at the site appeared to have "lost the race" to save the reactor, but said there was no danger of a Chernobyl-style catastrophe.

    Workers have been pumping water into three reactors at the stricken plant in a desperate bid to keep the fuel rods from melting down, but the fuel is at least partially exposed in all the reactors.

    At least part of the molten core, which includes melted fuel rods and zirconium alloy cladding, seemed to have sunk through the steel "lower head" of the pressure vessel around reactor two, Lahey said.

    "The indications we have, from the reactor to radiation readings and the materials they are seeing, suggest that the core has melted through the bottom of the pressure vessel in unit two, and at least some of it is down on the floor of the drywell," Lahey said. "I hope I am wrong, but that is certainly what the evidence is pointing towards."

    The major concern when molten fuel breaches a containment vessel is that it reacts with the concrete floor of the drywell underneath, releasing radioactive gases into the surrounding area. At Fukushima, the drywell has been flooded with seawater, which will cool any molten fuel that escapes from the reactor and reduce the amount of radioactive gas released.

    Lahey said: "It won't come out as one big glob; it'll come out like lava, and that is good because it's easier to cool."

    The drywell is surrounded by a secondary steel-and-concrete structure designed to keep radioactive material from escaping into the environment. But an earlier hydrogen explosion at the reactor may have damaged this.

    "The reason we are concerned is that they are detecting water outside the containment area that is highly radioactive and it can only have come from the reactor core," Lahey added. "It's not going to be anything like Chernobyl, where it went up with a big fire and steam explosion, but it's not going to be good news for the environment."

    The radiation level at a pool of water in the turbine room of reactor two was measured recently at 1,000 millisieverts per hour. At that level, workers could remain in the area for just 15 minutes, under current exposure guidelines.

    A less serious core meltdown happened at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania in 1979. During that incident, engineers managed to cool the molten fuel before it penetrated the steel pressure vessel. The task is a race against time, because as the fuel melts it forms a blob that becomes increasingly difficult to cool.

    In the light of the Fukushima crisis, Lahey said all countries with nuclear power stations should have "Swat teams" of nuclear reactor safety experts on standby to give swift advice to the authorities in times of emergency, with international groups co-ordinated by the International Atomic Energy Authority.

    The warning came as the Japanese authorities were being urged to give clearer advice to the public about the safety of food and drinking water contaminated with radioactive substances from Fukushima.

    Robert Peter Gale, a US medical researcher who was brought in by Soviet authorities after the Chernobyl disaster, in 1986, has met Japanese cabinet ministers to discuss establishing an independent committee charged with taking radiation data from the site and translating it into clear public health advice.

    "What is fundamentally disturbing the public is reports of drinking water one day being above some limit, and then a day or two later it's suddenly safe to drink. People don't know if the first instance was alarmist or whether the second one was untrue," said Gale.

    "My recommendation is they should consider establishing a small commission to independently convert the data into comprehensible units of risk for the public so people know what they are dealing with and can take sensible decisions," he added.

  • Source
  • Tuesday, March 29, 2011

    The Kill Team - US Soldiers in Afghanistan

    How U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan murdered innocent civilians and mutilated their corpses – and how their officers failed to stop them. Plus: An exclusive look at the war crime photos censored by the Pentagon
    From the start, the questionable nature of the killings was on the radar of senior Army leadership. Within days of the first murder, Rolling Stone has learned, Mudin's uncle descended on the gates of FOB Ramrod, along with 20 villagers from La Mohammad Kalay, to demand an investigation. "They were sitting at our front door," recalls Lt. Col. David Abrahams, the battalion's second in command. During a four-hour meeting with Mudin's uncle, Abrahams was informed that several children in the village had seen Mudin killed by soldiers from 3rd Platoon. The battalion chief ordered the soldiers to be reinterviewed, but Abrahams found "no inconsistencies in their story," and the matter was dropped. "It was cut and dry to us at the time," Abrahams recalls.

    Other officers were also in a position to question the murders. Neither 3rd Platoon's commander, Capt. Matthew Quiggle, nor 1st Lt. Roman Ligsay has been held accountable for their unit's actions, despite their repeated failure to report killings that they had ample reason to regard as suspicious. In fact, supervising the murderous platoon, or even having knowledge of the crimes, seems to have been no impediment to career advancement. Ligsay has actually been promoted to captain, and a sergeant who joined the platoon in April became a team leader even though he "found out about the murders from the beginning," according to a soldier who cooperated with the Army investigation.

  • Finish reading @ Rollingstone
  • Can Vitamins or Herbs Help Protect Us from Radiation?

    Preface: This is written for the millions of people around the world who are worried about radiation from the Japanese nuclear reactors. For those who are not worried about radiation from Japan, you can ignore this post, or save it for any future radiation scares closer to home.

    How do we protect ourselves against radiation?

    It is true that potassium iodide protects against high doses of a certain type of radiation. As the New York Times notes [1]:

    Fortunately, an easy form of protection is potassium iodide, a simple compound typically added to table salt to prevent goiter and a form of mental retardation caused by a dietary lack of iodine.

    If ingested promptly after a nuclear accident, potassium iodide, in concentrated form, can help reduce the dose of radiation to the thyroid and thus the risk of cancer. In the United States, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission recommends that people living within a 10-mile emergency planning zone around a nuclear plant have access to potassium iodide tablets.

    Indeed, virtually all suppliers of potassium iodide have sold out, especially after , the U.S. Surgeon General recommended that West Coast residents stock up

    But as I noted [3] yesterday:
    Keep in mind that iodide only protects against one particular radioactive element: radioactive iodine, technically known as iodine-131. Iodine-131 has a half life of only 8.02 days [4]. That means that the iodine loses half of its radioactivity within 8 days.

    The government hasn't stockpiled much potassium iodide. As the New York Times notes [5]:

    Congress passed legislation in 2002 requiring the federal government to supply potassium iodide capsules to people living within 20 miles of nuclear power plants in the United States.

    But the administrations of George W. Bush and Barack Obama have not implemented that provision, saying the law allows for alternatives.

    Some states have given pills to people living within 10 miles of nuclear plants, or stockpiled the pills for those people.

    But given that the government says that only minute amounts of radiation will hit the United States, and given that iodine-131 has such a short half-life, the whole issue may be moot (many, however, do not trust the government's assurances. See this [6] and this [7]). And taking high doses of potassium iodide can be harmful, especially for people with certain pre-existing medical conditions. So talk to your doctor before taking any.

    Other Radiation Dangers

    While iodine-131 poisoning can be prevented with potassium iodide, there are no silver bullets for other radioactive isotopes.

  • More
  • Obama restricts findings on Gulf’s dead dolphins

    The Obama administration has issued a gag order on data over the recent spike of dead dolphins, including many stillborn infants, washing up on Mississippi and Alabama shorelines, and scientists say the restriction undermines the scientific process.

    An abnormal dolphin mortality this year along the Gulf coast has become part of a federal criminal investigation over last year’s BP oil spill disaster and as a result, has led the US government to clamp down on biologists’ findings, with orders to keep the results confidential.
    The dolphin die-off, labeled an “unusual mortality event (UME),” resulted in wildlife biologists being contracted by the National Marine Fisheries Service to record the recent spike in dolphin deaths by collecting tissue samples and specimens for the agency, but late last month were privately ordered to keep their results under wraps.
    Reuters has obtained a copy of the agency letter that states, in part: “Because of the seriousness of the legal case, no data or findings may be released, presented or discussed outside the UME investigative team without prior approval.”
    One biologist involved with tracking dolphin mortalities for over 20 years and speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Reuters that: “It throws accountability right out the window. We are confused and ... we are angry because they claim they want teamwork, but at the same time they are leaving the marine experts out of the loop completely.”
    Some scientists said they have received a personal rebuke from government officials about “speaking out of turn” to the media over attempts at determining the dolphins’ deaths.
    Additionally, these scientists say the collected specimens and samples are being turned over to the government for evaluation under a deal that omits independent scientists from the final results of lab tests.
    Almost 200 dead bottlenose dolphin bodies have been found since mid-January through this week along shorelines of Gulf coast states, including Florida, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana, Reuters notes. About half of the carcasses are newborns or stillborn infants.
    That number is around 14 times the average numbers recorded during the same time frame between 2002 and 2007 and has coincidentally occurred during the first calving season since the BP Deepwater Horizon debacle last year in the Gulf.
    Although many of the dolphin specimens recently collected show no outward signs of oil contamination, lab analysis is crucial in helping to determine their deaths.
    Some experts believe the recent surge of deaths is the result of dolphins inhaling or ingesting oil during the oil spill, the results of which are just now beginning to show their toll, including a possible upsurge in dolphin miscarriages.
    The recent spike in dolphin deaths has compounded the dolphin mortality problem, as scientists were already busy attempting to determine the deaths of nearly 90 dead dolphins, mostly adults, that washed up along the US Gulf coast during the weeks and months after the BP disaster.
    Some are questioning the Marine Fisheries Service, part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and its delay in providing dolphin samples to laboratories.
    “It is surprising that it has been almost a full year since the spill, and they still haven't selected labs for this kind of work,” said Ruth Carmichael, of the independent Dauphin Island Sea Lab, located in Alabama, according to Reuters. “I can only hope that this process is a good thing. I just don’t know. This is an unfortunate situation,” she added.
    Officials with the NOAA state the confidentiality measures are an integral part of the current investigation over the BP oil spill.
    “We are treating the evidence, which are the dolphin samples, like a murder case,” said Dr. Erin Fougeres, a Fisheries Service marine biologist, Reuters notes. “The chain of custody is being closely watched. Every dolphin sample is considered evidence in the BP case now,” she added.

    Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/print/article/305096#ixzz1Hvh1WQdg

    Thursday, March 17, 2011

    Criminal negligence in Japan?

    Criminally negligent TEPCO Execs not the Exception in Japan but the Rule
    by quin Thursday, Mar 17 2011, 4:24am

    A little familiarity with Japanese history reveals a tradition of criminal corruption and deception from the highest echelons of society to the lowest – it’s a way of life! The deceptive and criminal behaviour of directors at Tokyo Electric, which included falsifying safety records and hiding rather than correcting problems at nuclear power plants, stems from a certain privileged class consciousness that considers itself above the law and regards the masses as nothing better than (expendable) serfs.

    Apologies from these Corporatists came only after it became obvious that the reactors were out of control and the situation would end in disaster. This hollow gesture was nothing more than a feign, designed to quell the anger of average Japanese. However, it fell short of satisfying the most liberal and forgiving Japanese, as the arrogance of the directors and insincerity of the apology could easily be detected by foreigners – how much more the Japanese! The appropriate course of action is known to the failed directors but they are liars, cheats and cowards and have no stomach for traditional rituals of contrition and saving honour.

    Nevertheless, nuclear technology does not fall from the sky and responsibility for the nuclear disaster must be shared with all involved parties.

    The chief designers for the Dai-ichi reactors are American; the multinational company General Electric or ‘GE,’ as it is known, is largely responsible for the faulty design of the reactors. However, the responsibility for safety falls directly on the shoulders of Japanese executives and government officials – most of whom, as is now painfully apparent, are less than honest and forthcoming!

    So we look to other means whereby justice is dispensed and it seems the old adage, “whatever goes around, comes around,” applies in the case of the massive radiation leaks from the faulty, American designed Dai-ichi reactors. Eastern cultures call it Karma; occidentals call it, 'reaping what you sow!’

    In an ironic twist, it seems the poisonous and highly toxic radiation that has been released into the atmosphere from the Fukushima reactors, is heading for North America via natures medium of transportation, the North Pacific jet stream!

    Residents on the Pacific coasts of Canada and the US have been frantically buying Potassium Iodide tablets as if it is some miracle substance. But panic turns the most cynical into drivelling believers.

    http://tinyurl.com/4h63ln2

    Japan in the Hands of God

    Writes Jay Roberts:

    Although I’m in the U.S. at the moment, my family remains in Osaka. FWIW, as a
    submarine officer, I went to the U.S. Navy’s nuclear power training and then
    operated naval reactors. Following this, I worked in the commercial nuclear
    power industry for a couple of years and then moved on to software development.
    While my motivations would require a long explanation, let’s just say I’m
    neither a booster nor an opponent of the technology but I do have a pretty clear
    eyed view of reactor operations and what people do in crises.
    I was pretty comfortable with the Fukushima situation for the first few days. If
    anything, the fact that they still maintained their integrity after an epic
    quake and tsunami is a testament to the design margins built into western
    reactors. However, two recent bits of news really gave me pause.
    The first was the fire caused by low water levels in the spent fuel pool in Unit
    4, which was shut down and defueled for maintenance. Normally, there would be
    all sorts of alarms about this, but with electricity gone, one would send people
    around to check on things. And with a plant defueled like Unit 4, the first
    thing one would want to check would be the spent fuel pool.
    This is not to suggest malfeasance though — rather, that the peoplee on site are
    completely overwhelmed by events to the extent that they can’t even spare
    somebody to go take a look at the fuel pool in Unit 4. One wonders what else may
    be going unnoticed.
    Â
    The second item was that the staffing on site was down to 50 people. Even under
    normal operations, this is a small fraction, but in an emergency, where all
    power and indications (gauges/alarms) are lost, it is in effect throwing one’s
    hands up in the air. This was about 24 hours ago when I read this stuff at which
    point I told my wife she should tell her sister-in-law to take her kids, get out
    of Tokyo as a precaution. It is an excellent time to visit grandma.
    My opinion was confirmed with the recent suggestion of using helicopters to dump
    stuff on the reactors, which is clearly well beyond the point of utter
    desperation in nuclear ops. If one recalls, this is what the Soviets resorted to
    at Chernobyl, shoveling boron out of helicopters into the smoking morass.
    Several days ago, discussing this incident with friends, I said that when they
    start talking about helicopters, that is when the situation is officially out of
    control.
    This all being said, there are still some positive shreds of hope.
    The first is that time is on everyone’s side. The more time that passes
    without devolution into catastrophe the less likely it is to happen. The
    residual fission products that cause the heat in fuel rods decay quickly, by
    orders of magnitude over the days following a plant shutdown.
    The second is that this is not Chernobyl. Chernobyl used a graphite moderated
    design that was well understood in the west to be extremely dangerous and had
    been abandoned after the Windscale incident. Similarly, there was no containment
    structure. This comparison is not apt.
    The third is that western reactors were built with huge design margins. Back in
    the 60’s, they didn’t have cheap computing power, so tthey would figure out
    the numbers on a slide rule, then multiply everything by 4 when designing a
    critical component. I was involved in reanalyzing a lot of reactor design in the
    early 90’s when we had relatively powerrful PCs with which we could do a more
    extensive analysis; everywhere we looked we found huge, unbelievable design
    margins. So while things aren’t looking so great at Fukushima, one can be
    assured that there is a great deal of ruin in a typical western reactor.
    The bad part is that this stout design is all we really have to rely on any more
    at the moment. With reactor buildings in shambles, high radiation levels, no
    power, etc., there truly is little way to figure out what is going on inside
    these reactors to the extent necessary to take actions. And even if this
    knowledge were available, the ability to take action at the moment is nearly nil
    — after explosions and tsunamis and fires, simply ideentifying which
    valves/systems/controls are which is probably an enormous task, and the
    consequences of making a mistake are dire.
    This one is in the Lord’s hands. It may yet turn out well, and offering a
    prayer for those struggling to control this catastrophe might be a way some
    readers can help.

    Saturday, March 12, 2011

    Operation Payback

    Operation Payback's third target since its revival is www.bmi.com

    We will not rest until our demands our met.

    We are Anonymous

    We are Legion

    We do not Forgive

    We do not Forget

    Expect Us

  • Source
  • Homeland Security Documents Reveal Radical Shift In Internet Policy


    Until a few weeks ago, Brian McCarthy ran a website, channelsurfing.net, that linked to various sites where you could watch online streams of TV shows and sports networks. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) seized his domain name in late January. All you'll find there now is a "This domain has been seized" warning, complete with a screeching eagle dive-bombing your face as he clutches a banner that reads "Protection is our trademark."

    Then, in an unprecedented move, on Friday they arrested McCarthy and charged him with criminal copyright infringement -- punishable by five years in prison.

    Demand Progress just obtained a copy of the complaint that DHS and ICE made against him: they do not even allege that he made a copy of anything. Just that he ran what they call a "linking website" which linked to various sites with infringing material.

    Based on my participation in the investigation leading to the February 2011 Seizure, I know that Channelsurfing.net was a "linking" website. Based on my training and experience, I know that "linking" websites generally collect and catalog links to files on third party websites...

    Prosecution for secondary liability -- linking to a site that houses infringing materials -- is without precedent. Under the logic that governs the arrest, any Internet user who sends around a link to a copyrighted YouTube video -- or posts such a link on their personal blog -- is a criminal. This new enforcement regime is certain to have a chilling effect across the Internet.

    The arrest represents yet another shocking overreach by DHS and ICE, whose policing of the Internet is growing ever more heavy-handed. We need to push back -- and fast -- before they try to lock up more Americans. Having accidentally seized 84,000 domains last month, it's clear that the agencies don't understand the operations of the Internet well enough to be in charge of policing it.

    Sign our petition:
  • demandprogress
  • Gaddafi jets bomb civilians in Ras Lanuf

    Troops loyal to embattled Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi have reportedly targeted residential areas in cities under the control of opposition forces.


    Warplanes reportedly bombed a refinery and residential houses in the eastern oil-rich city of Ras Lanuf on Friday.

    Gaddafi's troops are preventing ambulances from entering the cities and taking the injured to hospitals.

    Several people were killed and dozens were wounded in similar air strikes in Ras Lanuf and Brega on Thursday.

    Gaddafi's son, Seif al-Islam, has labeled revolutionary forces as “former Guantanamo inmates.”

    He said the current unrest in Libya is a military coup attempt. On Thursday, Seif al-Islam called the anti-government forces “terrorists” and promised a full-scale offensive against them.

    Meanwhile, revolutionary forces in Benghazi have sent reinforcements to Ras Lanuf to counter a major offensive by Gaddafi's loyalists.

    Thousands of Libyans have taken to the streets in Benghazi against the long-time rule of Colonel Gaddafi after the Friday Prayers.

    Benghazi's Friday Prayers Imam called on the protesters to continue fighting until Gaddafi's ouster.

    The city is no longer under Gaddafi's control. Benghazi is known as the capital of Libya's revolution and is home to the interim Transitional National Council.

    The 30-member body was established in the city by revolutionary forces following the liberation of several eastern cities.

    The council, headed by Libya's former justice minister Mustafa Abdel Jalil, plans to lead the country to an election.

    Jalil was among the first high-profile Libyan figures to join protesters following the Gaddafi regime's brutal crackdown on the opposition.

    The latest report published by the Libyan Human Rights League says a brutal crackdown by the regime on opposition protests that began two weeks ago has left an estimated 6,000 people dead so far.

    JR/HGH/MMN

    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/169372.html

    Japan

    Prayers for all those effected.

    The Calamity of Japan's 8.9-Magnitude Quake

    The Calamity of Japan's 8.9-Magnitude Quake

    Saturday, March 05, 2011

    Big-Money Speculation the Cause of Oil Price Volatility

    Commodity speculators crowding into markets like the NYMEX are the main cause of high crude and heating oil prices over the last 10 years, oil trader Dan Dicker said in an interview.

    As the CFTC struggles to gain its footing on the path to regulating oil speculation and hopefully tamping down price volatility and manipulation, the debate over the true cause of volatility continues. Groups led by petroleum retailers like heating oil dealers and businesses that rely heavily on petroleum products like commercial airlines continue to forcefully argue that out-of-control speculation is driving up oil prices. Financial interests like investment banks and commodity markets continue to deny that speculative activity has any hand in inflating or destabilizing oil prices.

    A veteran oil trader interviewed by CNBC this week offered his two cents in the debate in no uncertain terms: the new class of speculative investors in oil markets is the main cause of oil prices spikes since 2000. Dan Dicker has traded oil products at the New York Mercantile Exchange for 25 years, and “put investment banks first” on his list of those responsible for rising oil prices during his brief interview with CNBC. Investment banks, with billions of dollars of capital at their disposal, have become major participants in oil trading since the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 opened up the markets to them and other speculators. According to Dicker, the sheer volume of oil-based investment products purchased by investment banks leads directly to Americans paying more for gasoline and heating oil:

    The three largest investment banks trade in oil as well and make a couple of billion dollars each trading oil a year, which directly comes out of the pockets of consumers.

    Second on his blame list are individual investors in oil markets, who participate through index funds and commodity based exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Collectively, these speculative investors have the same effect on the oil market as investment banks—their combined investment wealth is theoretically large enough to move the prices of commodities like crude oil and heating oil. And because nearly all of these investment funds are buying up futures contracts and futures-derived products, essentially betting on higher prices, they nearly always move prices higher. As Dicker explained, “These new participants are exclusively buying; no one is selling and everyone wants to hold.”

    It is worth noting that Dicker never uses the words “speculation” or “speculator” in his interview, though any commodity investor not interested in possessing the physical product they are buying or selling is technically a speculator. His omission of those terms likely speaks to his long-time profession: whatever its effects on prices, speculation is a big part of commodities trading, and condemning it in broad strokes could hurt a traders’ standing within his industry.

    Whatever the trading activity is called, Dicker’s stance is clear: speculation on oil by investment banks, index funds, and ETFs are primarily responsible for the last decade’s volatile and steeply rising oil prices that have claimed increasingly large slices of the average American household’s budget.

    It may not be the “smoking gun” that commodity speculation reform advocates are looking for, but the opinion of an oil trader with more than two decades of experience should be given considerable weight in the debate over whether and how much to regulate oil speculation.

    Dan Dicker’s forthcoming book, Oil’s Endless Bid: Taming the Unreliable Price of Oil to Secure our Economy, is available for pre-order at Amazon.com. Articles about oil prices written by Dicker can be found at TheStreet.com, to which he is a Senior Contributor.

    US behind Stuxnet worm

    Computer expert says US behind Stuxnet worm
    Thu Mar 3, 3:41 pm ET

    LONG BEACH, California (AFP) – A German computer security expert said Thursday he believes the United States and Israel's Mossad unleashed the malicious Stuxnet worm on Iran's nuclear program.

    "My opinion is that the Mossad is involved," Ralph Langner said while discussing his in-depth Stuxnet analysis at a prestigious TED conference in the Southern California city of Long Beach.

    "But, the leading source is not Israel... There is only one leading source, and that is the United States."

    There has been widespread speculation Israel was behind the Stuxnet worm that has attacked computers in Iran, and Tehran has blamed the Jewish state and the United States for the killing of two nuclear scientists in November and January.

    "The idea behind Stuxnet computer worm is really quite simple," Langner said. "We don't want Iran to get the bomb."

    The malicious code was crafted to stealthily take control of valves and rotors at an Iranian nuclear plant, according to Langner.

    "It was engineered by people who obviously had inside information," he explained. "They probably also knew the shoe size of the operator."

    Stuxnet targets computer control systems made by German industrial giant Siemens and commonly used to manage water supplies, oil rigs, power plants and other critical infrastructure.

    "The idea here is to circumvent digital data systems, so the human operator could not get there fast enough," Langner said.

    "When digital safety systems are compromised, really bad things can happen -- your plant can blow up.

    Most Stuxnet infections have been discovered in Iran, giving rise to speculation it was intended to sabotage nuclear facilities there.

    The New York Times reported in January that US and Israeli intelligence services collaborated to develop the computer worm to sabotage Iran's efforts to make a nuclear bomb.

    Bradley Manning forced to sleep naked in brig

    WikiLeaks suspect forced to sleep naked in brig
    By DAVID DISHNEAU, Associated Press David Dishneau, Associated Press

    WASHINGTON – The Army private suspected of giving classified U.S. documents to the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks was forced to sleep naked in a military jail at least once this week, the Marine Corps acknowledged Friday after the soldier's lawyer complained.

    Commanders of the brig in Quantico, Va., ordered all of Pfc. Bradley Manning's clothing, including his boxer shorts, taken from him Wednesday night under provisions of the Navy Corrections Manual, which governs prisoner treatment, said 1st Lt. Brian Villiard, a spokesman for the Marine Corps base.

    "It was a situationally driven event but to go into detail about it would be inappropriate because it would violate the detainee's privacy," Villiard said.

    Col. Thomas V. Johnson, another Quantico spokesman, said the treatment was not punitive.

    Manning, a former intelligence analyst, is charged with aiding the enemy and 33 other offenses for allegedly stealing computer files of more than 250,000 confidential State Department cables, classified video of a deadly U.S. helicopter attack and a raft of Iraq and Afghanistan war logs. The video and thousands of the documents have been published on the WikiLeaks website.

    He was arrested in May and brought to Quantico July 29 from a detention facility in Kuwait.

    The Navy Corrections Manual permits clothing removal for prisoners who have threatened suicide or made a suicidal gesture, or for strip searches involving suspicion of a crime. Villiard said Manning hadn't been placed on suicide watch.

    The 23-year-old Crescent, Okla., native remains in maximum custody and on prevention-of-injury status — designations that keep him confined alone 23 hours a day, and require removal of all clothing except his boxer shorts at night.

    Civilian defense attorney David Coombs wrote on his blog Thursday night that Manning had been inexplicably stripped of his clothing for seven hours Wednesday night.

    "This type of degrading treatment is inexcusable and without justification. It is an embarrassment to our military justice system and should not be tolerated," Coombs wrote.

    In January, after Manning was placed on suicide watch for two days, Coombs filed a complaint with the base commander alleging the brig commander broke military rules and ignored the brig's own psychiatrist's recommendation regarding Manning's mental state. Coombs contends the confinement conditions are punitive.

    The United Nations torture investigator is pursuing an inquiry into Manning's confinement, based on allegations by a Manning supporter.

    Manning's friend and frequent visitor David House, of Cambridge, Mass., said in a teleconference with reporters Wednesday that Manning's mental state has deteriorated during his more than eight months at Quantico.

    Friday, March 04, 2011

    NATO apologizes for killing 9 Afghan civilians

    Is an apology enough?

    NATO's top commander in Afghanistan apologized Wednesday for the accidental killing of nine Afghan boys and ordered attack helicopter crews to be briefed again on his directive for preventing civilian deaths.

    Civilian casualties have long been a source of friction between the U.S.-led international force and Afghan President Hamid Karzai. The president condemned the deaths, saying the victims were "innocent children who were collecting firewood for their families during this cold winter."

    "Is this the way to fight terrorism and maintain stability in Afghanistan?" Karzai asked in a statement Wednesday. He said NATO should focus more on "terrorist sanctuaries" — a phrase he typically uses when referring to Taliban havens in neighboring Pakistan.

    The incident on Tuesday in the Pech valley area of Kunar province came less than two weeks after tribal elders there claimed NATO forces killed more than 50 civilians in recent air and ground strikes. The coalition denied that claim, saying video showed troops targeting and killing dozens of insurgents. It said a subsequent investigation yielded no evidence that civilians had been killed. An Afghan government investigation, however, maintained that 65 civilians died in coalition operations in a remote part of the province.

    Several hundred villagers in the area protested for four hours Wednesday against coalition strikes. Demonstrators chanted "Death to America" and "Death to the spies," a reference to what they said was bad intelligence given to helicopter weapons teams, said Noorullah Noori, a member of the local development council in Manogai district.

    He said four of the nine boys killed were 7 years old, three were 8, one was 9 years old and one was 12. One child was also wounded, he said.

    He said the children were gathering wood under a tree in the mountains about near a village in the district.

    "I myself was involved in the burial," Noori said. "Yesterday we buried them."

    Civilians are increasingly the victims of the escalating Afghan war, particular from planted bombs on roads and in markets. A recent United Nations report said it documented 2,412 conflict-related civilian casualties in the first 10 months of 2010. More than three-quarters of them were caused by militant activity, a 25 percent increase from the same period in 2009, the report said. At the same time, civilian casualties attributed to pro-government forces decreased.

    NATO said there apparently was miscommunication in passing information to coalition helicopters about the location of militants firing on Forward Operating Base Blessing.

    "We are deeply sorry for this tragedy and apologize to the members of the Afghan government, the people of Afghanistan and most importantly, the surviving family members of those killed by our actions," said Gen. David. Petraeus, the top commander of U.S. and international troops in Afghanistan. "These deaths should have never happened and I will personally apologize to President Karzai."

    Petraeus said the accidental killings were particularly distressing because he recently directed his commanders to review NATO directions intended to reduce civilian casualties to the "absolute minimum." He said he has ordered all NATO leaders and members of coalition attack helicopter crews to be re-briefed on the tactical directive to emphasize the need to be sure "we protect the lives of innocent Afghans as we pursue a ruthless enemy."

    He said that NATO "accepts full responsibility for this tragedy and will continue to thoroughly investigate this incident to understand why this happened and try to prevent this from happening in the future."

    "Should the facts of the investigation warrant it, appropriate action, include disciplinary action if necessary, will be taken," he added.

    Karzai has repeatedly called on NATO to do more to protect civilians during stepped-up military operations. In response, former NATO commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal severely limited the circumstances in which troops could call in an airstrike or fire into buildings where civilians might be inside.

    The revised rules, which are classified, never prevented U.S. troops from calling in air support, but some officers were exerting excessive caution, fearing career damage if civilians were mistakenly killed. Analysts said the rules were being interpreted and implemented unevenly across the country.

    When Petraeus arrived in July, he reiterated the tactical directive, but emphasized that officers in the field should not add restrictions to his rules.

    In Logar province on Tuesday, a roadside bomb killed four Afghan soldiers and their interpreter while on patrol, according to provincial spokesman Din Mohammad Darwesh.

    In the south, Afghan security forces in Kandahar seized a car loaded with explosives as well as communication equipment, remote controls for detonating bombs, guns, mines, rocket launchers, mortars and ammunition.

    ___

    Associated Press Writer Rahim Faiez and Amir Shah in Kabul contributed to this report.

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/03/02/roadside-bomb-kills-4-afghan-soldiers-interpreter/#ixzz1FZfoD2dg

    Thursday, March 03, 2011

    The Hippies were right?

    STOP RUPERT MURDOCH

    In 48 hours, nearly half the British mass media could be bought by one of the world's worst media moguls.

    Rupert Murdoch has exploited his vast media empire to push war in Iraq, elect George W Bush, spread resentment of muslims and immigrants, and block global action on climate change. He undermines democratic government across the world by threatening elected leaders with vicious and often false media coverage unless they do his bidding.

    Britain plays a key role in Europe and the world. If Murdoch has a lock on British media, he will use it to undermine UK, EU and UN support for human rights and democracy. The UK is up in arms over the Murdoch bid, and even the government, elected with Murdoch's help, is split down the middle as it makes a decision this week. Global solidarity bolstered Egypt's pro-democracy protesters -- it can help Britain's. Let's build an urgent global outcry to stop Rupert Murdoch. Sign the petition to Prime Minister Cameron and Deputy Prime Minister Clegg!
  • Source
  • U.S. Backs Bahrain Royalty

    If I comment it would be enough to send me to jail

    The U.S. is stepping up its support for Bahrain's beleaguered ruling family, throwing a lifeline to a key ally and signaling Washington's willingness to vary its approach depending on its strategic interests and the willingness of autocratic leaders to respond to popular protests.

    After backing opposition calls for the removal of President Hosni Mubarak in Egypt and Col. Moammar Gadhafi in Libya, President Barack Obama has tentatively embraced efforts by King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa of Bahrain to ease tensions and advance reform, despite an initial wave of violence against protesters.

    Mr. Obama and other officials, in statements this week, welcomed the ruling family's outreach efforts and the king's decisions to reshuffle his cabinet, pull back his forces and free political prisoners. Mr. Obama said the dialogue was an "opportunity for meaningful reform."

    The U.S. military is playing a key role behind the scenes in the Obama administration's decision making, underlining Bahrain's strategic importance as the headquarters of the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet and as a bulwark against Iran, according to officials and diplomats.

    The kingdom's use of force against widespread protests left seven dead, prompting Mr. Obama to condemn the use of violence and call for restraint. The royal family later pulled its forces back, reducing tensions.

    It is uncertain what will result from the latest outreach, and whether the U.S. will stand by the ruling family if more violence breaks out. Tensions in Manama, the capital, flared again this week after several days of relative calm. Several hundred protesters marched on an intersection in the financial district late Tuesday, chanting, "Down, down Khalifa."

    "We're here to escalate the protests because we want the king out," said one demonstrator, Hassan Mohammed Hassan.

    The show of U.S. support for the ruling family follows a lobbying push by Bahrain and its main ally in the region, Saudi Arabia, the officials and diplomats said.

    In private talks in recent days, Bahraini officials have appealed to the Obama administration to lend higher-level support for the king and Crown Prince Sheikh Salman bin Hamad al-Khalifa's offer to open a dialogue with opposition groups.

    "This is the support we expect because of the relationship and because of what we are doing," a senior Bahraini official said of the monarchy's message to the Obama administration. "We have taken action, solid steps, to begin dialogue with all parties."

    Without Washington's support, Bahraini officials told the Americans, the kingdom risked slipping into a "sectarian divide," pitting a Shiite majority against ruling Sunnis.

    Bahraini officials also warned the U.S. that Iran would be the big winner should the ruling family fall. U.S. officials are skeptical of Bahraini claims that Iran is behind the uprising.

    Saudi lobbying on behalf of Bahrain underscores Riyadh's fears that it could come under pressure next, if its neighbor succumbs to the opposition, Arab officials said.

    Administration officials remain cautious about the way forward in Bahrain. "Steps announced by the king thus far are positive…but obviously there's a trust deficit that has to be overcome and that will require difficult steps," an administration official said.

    Anthony Cordesman, an expert on the region with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said the Obama administration understood that it can't respond to the unrest sweeping the region with a "one-size-fits-all" approach. "These pressures occur in very different regimes with very different social and economic situations, and the administration has to be pragmatic," he said.

    While Mr. Mubarak in Egypt and Col. Gadhafi in Libya showed a "systemic resistance to reform," the royal family of Bahrain has made "serious promises of change," Mr. Cordesman said.

    In contrast to Bahrain, Mr. Mubarak's call for a "national dialogue" to address protesters' demands was met with skepticism at the White House.

    An Obama administration official said the White House has articulated the "same values" in all of the countries caught up in the unrest by calling for rights for demonstrators and "meaningful" reforms. "Our core principles are the same—nonviolence, universal rights and meaningful reform," the official said. "How to get from here to there is determined by the actions of the people in the various countries."
    Write to Joe Parkinson at joe.parkinson@dowjones.com

  • Source
  • The Expended Earth

    The theory of Earth expansion has remained a scientific impossibility without the support of physical fact. Despite both logic and intuitive reasoning (based on the look of the Earth's features), past attempts to create a model have been unsuccessful. Here, presented as never before, is a live model, one which is enduring and provides consistent results which are readily observed. The model offers empirical evidence of expansion.
    The purpose for presenting this evidence is two-fold. The first aim is to promote a general awareness among readers of the radial expansion theory as a logical thesis of continental positioning, having found that this concept is relatively unknown or often too quickly dismissed by scholars without consideration of the substantial evidence. Furthermore, in contrast to continental drift and its supporting theories, the components of Earth expansion are far more significant in terms of understanding the origins of our planet's physical properties. Empirically supported with a live model, the theory of global expansion promoted here challenges these theories. Why the continents achieved their current position is explained with this model of an expanded Earth.

  • Much More
  • Wednesday, March 02, 2011

    Report: The Kochs

    Posted for your information if you want it?
    Report: The Kochs, A Nazi Past, Oil & The Foundation of The Right
    Notorious Nazis Ilse Koch, her husband Karl Otto Koch and Erich Koch are the ghosts of Koch Industries, who seized the U.S. conservative political agenda years ago and seem capable of seizing the government in total through the Tea Party. Ilse Koch was the Nazi’s specialist in making objects from human skin; was the only woman charged with war crimes; and along with her husband was in charge of one of the most horrific horror camps in Nazi Germany.

    Koch Industries is the child of the violence of Buchenwald, widely regarded as one of wartime Germany’s most notorious “death camps”.

    Information connecting Ilse and Koch Industries is hard to find but is a string of fragments, pieces of information that connects the American and German Kochs and this connection gives us a clear image of the sentiment behind the Tea Party and conservative American politics since the 1950s. Where is the connection between the German Koch’s and Fred Koch? Besides evidence the American Koch was related to Ilse’s family, Erich Koch (a high level Nazi official in charge of Prussia) invites Fred Koch to sell his oil in Nazi Germany when he is banned from doing business in the US. After the fall of Nazi Germany, Erich Koch and Fred expand the oil empire to the Soviet Union. Erich Koch had been in charge of Prussia for Hitler so his ties to the Soviet Union ran deep. A few years later the Soviets took Fred Koch’s oil and prosecuted Erich for war crimes – Fred Koch returned to the US, became anti-communist, and was allowed to do business in the States again.

    American Fred Koch, and through association the Kochs from Germany, establish the John Birch Society in the 1950s in NY, which becomes the policy center for American conservatives. The society was built on Fred Koch’s oil money in the 1950s and can be thought of as the center of neo-conservative politics as well as the Tea Party movement. The ideologies of each are not the same – but the Tea Party fits into the neo-conservative put for colonial corporate police state as a sort of consumer citizen of the neo-conservative strategy mad as hell at the government and the legacy of liberalism, postmodernism, multiculturalism, taxes….etc.

    Ilse and her husband Karl were tried by the SS before the war ended, accused of corruption. Her husband Karl Otto Koch was tried and sentenced to death in Nazi Germany. After the war, Ilse was arrested in the German American Zone, tried in front of a tribunal and sentenced, but was quickly pardoned by the American general appointed leader of the zone.

    More at link
  • Source
  • Behind the Arab revolt

    Behind the Arab revolt is a word we dare not speak
    24 February 2011

    Shortly after the invasion of Iraq in 2003, I interviewed Ray McGovern, one of an elite group of CIA officers who prepared the President’s daily intelligence brief. McGovern was at the apex of the “national security” monolith that is American power and had retired with presidential plaudits. On the eve of the invasion, he and 45 other senior officers of the CIA and other intelligence agencies wrote to President George W. Bush that the “drumbeat for war” was based not on intelligence, but lies.

    “It was 95 per cent charade,” McGovern told me.

    “How did they get away with it?”

    “The press allowed the crazies to get away with it.”

    “Who are the crazies?”

    “The people running the [Bush] administration have a set of beliefs a lot like those expressed in Mein Kampf... these are the same people who were referred to in the circles in which I moved, at the top, as ‘the crazies’.”

    I said, “Norman Mailer has written that that he believes America has entered a pre-fascist state. What’s your view of that?”

    “Well... I hope he’s right, because there are others saying we are already in a fascist mode.”

    On 22 January, Ray McGovern emailed me to express his disgust at the Obama administration’s barbaric treatment of the alleged whistleblower Bradley Manning and its pursuit of WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange. “Way back when George and Tony decided it might be fun to attack Iraq,” he wrote, “I said something to the effect that fascism had already begun here. I have to admit I did not think it would get this bad this quickly.”

    On 16 February, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave a speech at George Washington University in which she condemned governments that arrested protestors and crushed free expression. She lauded the liberating power of the internet while failing to mention that her government was planning to close down those parts of the internet that encouraged dissent and truth-telling. It was a speech of spectacular hypocrisy, and Ray McGovern was in the audience. Outraged, he rose from his chair and silently turned his back on Clinton. He was immediately seized by police and a security goon and beaten to the floor, dragged out and thrown into jail, bleeding. He has sent me photographs of his injuries. He is 71. During the assault, which was clearly visible to Clinton, she did not pause in her remarks.

    Fascism is a difficult word, because it comes with an iconography that touches the Nazi nerve and is abused as propaganda against America’s official enemies and to promote the West’s foreign adventures with a moral vocabulary written in the struggle against Hitler. And yet fascism and imperialism are twins. In the aftermath of world war two, those in the imperial states who had made respectable the racial and cultural superiority of “western civilisation”, found that Hitler and fascism had claimed the same, employing strikingly similar methods. Thereafter, the very notion of American imperialism was swept from the textbooks and popular culture of an imperial nation forged on the genocidal conquest of its native people. And a war on social justice and democracy became “US foreign policy”.

    As the Washington historian William Blum has documented, since 1945, the US has destroyed or subverted more than 50 governments, many of them democracies, and used mass murderers like Suharto, Mobutu and Pinochet to dominate by proxy. In the Middle East, every dictatorship and pseudo-monarchy has been sustained by America. In “Operation Cyclone”, the CIA and MI6 secretly fostered and bank-rolled Islamic extremism. The object was to smash or deter nationalism and democracy. The victims of this western state terrorism have been mostly Muslims. The courageous people gunned down last week in Bahrain and Libya, the latter a “priority UK market”, according to Britain’s official arms “procurers”, join those children blown to bits in Gaza by the latest American F-16 aircraft.

    The revolt in the Arab world is not merely against a resident dictator but a worldwide economic tyranny designed by the US Treasury and imposed by the US Agency for International Development, the IMF and World Bank, which have ensured that rich countries like Egypt are reduced to vast sweatshops, with half the population earning less than $2 a day. The people’s triumph in Cairo was the first blow against what Benito Mussolini called corporatism, a word that appears in his definition of fascism.

    How did such extremism take hold in the liberal West? “It is necessary to destroy hope, idealism, solidarity, and concern for the poor and oppressed,” observed Noam Chomsky a generation ago, “[and] to replace these dangerous feelings with self-centred egoism, a pervasive cynicism that holds that [an order of] inequities and oppression is the best that can be achieved. In fact, a great international propaganda campaign is under way to convince people – particularly young people – that this not only is what they should feel but that it’s what they do feel.”

    Like the European revolutions of 1848 and the uprising against Stalinism in 1989, the Arab revolt has rejected fear. An insurrection of suppressed ideas, hope and solidarity has begun. In the United States, where 45 per cent of young African-Americans have no jobs and the top hedge fund managers are paid, on average, a billion dollars a year, mass protests against cuts in services and jobs have spread to heartland states like Wisconsin. In Britain, the fastest-growing modern protest movement, UK Uncut, is about to take direct action against tax avoiders and rapacious banks. Something has changed that cannot be unchanged. The enemy has a name now.
  • Source
  • John Pilger is one of my favorite people in the world.

    Tuesday, March 01, 2011

    Corporatism... the dark side of the moon .....

    Boy oh boy!!!!!!!!!

    As politicians are asking ordinary Americans to sacrifice their education, their health, their labor rights, and their wellbeing to tackle budget deficits, some of the world's richest multinational corporations are getting away with shirking their responsibility and paying nothing. ThinkProgress has assembled a short but far from comprehensive list of these tax dodgers - corporations which have rigged the tax system to their advantage so they can reap huge profits and avoid paying taxes:

    - BANK OF AMERICA: In 2009, Bank of America didn't pay a single penny in federal income taxes, exploiting the tax code so as to avoid paying its fair share. "Oh, yeah, this happens all the time," said Robert Willens, a tax accounting expert interviewed by McClatchy. "If you go out and try to make money and you don't do it, why should the government pay you for your losses?" asked Bob McIntyre of Citizens for Tax Justice. The same year, the mega-bank's top executives received pay "ranging from $6 million to nearly $30 million."

    - BOEING: Despite receiving billions of dollars from the federal government every single year in taxpayer subsidies from the U.S. government, Boeing didn't "pay a dime of U.S. federal corporate income taxes" between 2008 and 2010.

    - CITIGROUP: Citigroup's deferred income taxes for the third quarter of 2010 amounted to a grand total of $0.00. At the same time, Citigroup has continued to pay its staff lavishly. "John Havens, the head of Citigroup's investment bank, is expected to be the bank's highest paid executive for the second year in a row, with a compensation package worth $9.5 million."

    - EXXON-MOBIL: The oil giant uses offshore subsidiaries in the Caribbean to avoid paying taxes in the United States. Although Exxon-Mobil paid $15 billion in taxes in 2009, not a penny of those taxes went to the American Treasury. This was the same year that the company overtook Wal-Mart in the Fortune 500. Meanwhile the total compensation of Exxon-Mobil's CEO the same year was over $29,000,000.

    - GENERAL ELECTRIC: In 2009, General Electric - the world's largest corporation - filed more than 7,000 tax returns and still paid nothing to U.S. government. They managed to do this by a tax code that essentially subsidizes companies for losing profits and allows them to set up tax havens overseas. That same year GE CEO Jeffery Immelt - who recently scored a spot on a White House economic advisory board - "earned total compensation of $9.89 million." In 2002, Immelt displayed his lack of economic patriotism, saying, "When I am talking to GE managers, I talk China, China, China, China, China....I am a nut on China. Outsourcing from China is going to grow to 5 billion."

    - WELLS FARGO: Despite being the fourth largest bank in the country, Wells Fargo was able to escape paying federal taxes by writing all of its losses off after its acquisition of Wachovia. Yet in 2009 the chief executive of Wells Fargo also saw his compensation "more than double" as he earned "a salary of $5.6 million paid in cash and stock and stock awards of more than $13 million."

    In the coming months, politicians across the country are going to tell Americans that the only way to stave off huge deficit and balance the budgets is by gutting programs for the poor, eviscerating support for the middle class, eliminating labor rights, and decimating the government's ability to serve the public interest. This is a lie. The United States is the richest country in the history of the world, and income inequality is higher now than it has been at any time since the 1920′s, with the top "top 1 percentile of households [taking] home 23.5 percent of income in 2007."

    You Have More Money in Your Wallet Than Bank of America Pays in Federal Taxes

    as for those picking-up the tab .....

    The large demonstrations at the state Capitol in Madison, Wisconsin are driven by a middle class awakening to the spectre of its destruction by the corporate reactionaries and their toady Governor Scott Walker.

    For years the middle class has watched the plutocrats stomp on the poor while listening to the two parties regale the great middle class, but never mentioning the tens of millions of poor Americans. And for years, the middle class was shrinking due significantly to corporate globalization shipping good-paying jobs overseas to repressive dictatorships like China. It took Governor Walker's legislative proposal to do away with most collective bargaining rights for most public employee unions to jolt people to hit the streets.

    Republicans take rigged elections awash in corporatist campaign cash seriously. When they win, they aggressively move their corporate agenda, unlike the wishy-washy Democrats who flutter weakly after a victory. Republicans mean business. A ram rod wins against a straw all the time.

    Governor Walker won his election, along with other Republicans in Wisconsin, on mass-media driven Tea Party rhetoric. His platform was deceitful enough to get the endorsement of the police, and firefighters unions, which the latter have now indignantly withdrawn.

    'Mad As Hell' In Madison
  • Source
  • Atlas Of Pollution

    I do not know how Julia Gillard thinks a carbon tax will help except to make the people poorer. We need to change the way we live

    The deepest recession since the 1930s has failed to reverse rising global carbon emissions, as plummeting industrial output in the west was offset by the continuing rapid expansion of China and a handful of other emerging economies, new statistics for 2009 show.

    While US emissions fell substantially in 2009, to levels not seen since 1995-96, China surged ahead with an increase of more than 13% on the previous year – the equivalent of adding the yearly emissions of Germany, Greece and Peru combined.

    Europe, Russia, Canada and South Africa saw their emissions dip, and India has risen to third place in the league table, with the strong growth in its carbon output driven by a ramping-up of coal burning to generate power.

    Overall, by these estimates, global emissions fell by a tiny 0.1%. For short periods in the wake of less severe recessions, such as those in 1981-83, and 1991-92, emissions fell more steeply only to continue their upward trend shortly afterwards.

    These statistics, from the US Energy Information Administration, track only carbon dioxide emitted by energy use – such as from coal and gas power stations, and motor vehicles. They exclude emissions from other sources such as methane from livestock, and deforestation.

    The map reveals how heavily future emissions trends depend on China, which overtook the US as the world's biggest emitter in 2006-07. China's emissions have so far risen just as fast as its runaway economic growth, but the government is hoping to "decouple" the two in the next decade, reducing the country's emissions per unit of GDP by 40 to 45% by 2020, compared with 2005 levels. Doing so will be essential if global greenhouse gas emissions are to fall in line with scientific warnings.

    But green campaigners want to stop western companies using the focus on China and their own falling output as an excuse for backpedalling on climate change. They have urged governments in developed countries to strengthen their emissions targets to prevent businesses from taking what would amount to an "emissions holiday".

    According to calculations from Sandbag, the green campaigning group, the impact of the recession on emissions means European Union companies could do nothing more to fight climate change between now and 2016, and still meet their targets of a 20% cut by 2020.

    Comparable figures for 2010 will not be compiled for months, but the key question will be whether this recession follows the pattern of all others – a short pause followed by a swift return to the relentless year-on-year emissions increases of the last three decades – or whether this time is different, and the world is genuinely on a path to greener economic growth. With scientists warning that carbon must peak around 2015 to give the world a fighting chance of avoiding dangerous climate change, the next few years will be crucial.

    * guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media Limited 2011

  • Source/Data Graph